Proposed state
Supported
The record contains source spans that directly support the assertion.
Texas commercial litigation · Claim Assurance evaluation
Turn a matter record into a source-linked disputed-fact packet.
Evidence. Contradictions. Attorney review.
One matter. Visible sources. An attorney-owned release decision.
- Matter-scoped evidence retrieval, not web-wide search.
- Exact source spans and competing evidence stay reviewable.
- Insufficient evidence remains an explicit outcome.
Shipped in production · Matter-scoped intake and isolationShipped in production · Evidence-backed retrieval and analysis laneRequires rollout conditions · Contradiction and discovery-defect checksShipped in production · Evidence pack with source-linked excerpts
The Claim Assurance classification target is not yet validated for production reliance. Evaluations retain attorney control.
Guided proof path · ~7 minutes
Start in the lane that maps to your workflow.
The seeded Texas demo proof path starts with matter posture, then moves from evidence-backed retrieval to contradiction checks, citation trust transitions, and partner-safe reviewer gates.
Need faster confidence in disputed facts before drafting motions or settlement analysis.
- Matter-scoped intake and isolation(Shipped in production)
Matter membership hard-scoped from the start
- Evidence-backed retrieval and analysis lane(Shipped in production)
Query output includes supporting evidence chunks
- Reviewer gate: approve, escalate, reject(Shipped in production)
Stateful work-product handoff
The proof path includes matter posture, evidence-backed retrieval, citation posture, and reviewer handoff states. Texas modules are explicitly marked as shipped vs. pilot as implemented.
Trust posture states — all five are visible in the product
Verified
Fully supported by available sources and verification posture.
Retrieved — unverified
Retrieved from corpus, but verification is incomplete or pending.
Unsupported
No source-backed chain available at current run.
Thin support
Evidence exists, but current support density is weak.
Corpus gap
Source path is not available from this tenant or environment.
Best fit
Role-specific outcomes for first-week evaluation
01
Intake and matter posture
You can only trust downstream AI output when intake state and scope are correct.
02
Evidence-backed retrieval + contradiction checks
This beat shows whether synthesis is evidence-diffused or still depends on unconfirmed assumptions.
03
Contradictions, settlement framing, and defect signals
A useful AI path for litigation is not just coherent prose — it is the early visibility of what is risky.
04
Citation trust states and posture transitions
This is the core trust test: the product must preserve uncertainty until a reviewer can act on it.
05
Reviewer gate + Texas output path
Workflow value is only realized when reviewer control is the final authority for work-product readiness.
Evaluation target — not yet validated for production reliance.
Prove what the record supports—and show when it cannot.
The proposed Claim Assurance workflow decomposes a disputed position into reviewable assertions, preserves exact source spans, surfaces competing evidence, and abstains when the record is insufficient. It is an evaluation program, not an autonomous legal conclusion.
Initial evaluations use one isolated matter, agreed baseline metrics, and attorney disposition on every surfaced high-risk conflict. No cross-matter learning is implied.
Proposed state
Contradicted
Competing source spans create a material conflict for attorney review.
Proposed state
Insufficient
The available record does not justify a confident conclusion.
Operating model
Proof chain, not a generic chat flow.
Every lane in LexAlign is a stateful artifact. The same chain is visible in the guided demo and in an authenticated matter.
- 1
Intake and case-state baseline
Matter membership hard-scoped from the start
Shipped in production proof lane
Workflows move forward only when uncertainty is either resolved or explicitly deferred.
Open proof beat - 2
Research lane + retrieval synthesis
Query output includes supporting evidence chunks
Shipped in production proof lane
Workflows move forward only when uncertainty is either resolved or explicitly deferred.
Open proof beat - 3
Evidence pack with source links
Chunk-level evidence traceability
Shipped in production proof lane
Workflows move forward only when uncertainty is either resolved or explicitly deferred.
Open proof beat - 4
Contradiction and defect checks
Potentially conflicting evidence states surfaced in workflow
Requires rollout conditions proof lane
Workflows move forward only when uncertainty is either resolved or explicitly deferred.
Caveat: The current workflow uses a candidate-generation heuristic and is not yet calibrated for production reliance; benchmark and attorney review gates are required.
Open proof beat - 5
Citation trust transitions
Verified / unverified / unsupported states are always visible
Requires rollout conditions proof lane
Workflows move forward only when uncertainty is either resolved or explicitly deferred.
Caveat: All citation states are visible; some external verifiers can remain unavailable or degraded.
Open proof beat - 6
Reviewer gate + legal readiness decision
Stateful work-product handoff
Shipped in production proof lane
Workflows move forward only when uncertainty is either resolved or explicitly deferred.
Open proof beat - 7
Texas legal output path
Texas formatting + verification rules applied consistently
Shipped in production proof lane
Workflows move forward only when uncertainty is either resolved or explicitly deferred.
Open proof beat
Why teams switch
Value buckets that change how teams work
Grouped around proof outcomes: reliability, speed, and auditability.
Reliability
Reduce blind trust by surfacing support density and unknowns upfront.
Status: Requires rollout conditions
Proof anchors: evidence_pack, citation_posture, contradiction_checks.
- Chunk-level evidence traceability — Explicit support-density indicators
- Verified / unverified / unsupported states are always visible — Review-ready citations stay linked to source rows
- Potentially conflicting evidence states surfaced in workflow — Discovery defects highlighted before draft finalization
Speed
Compress discovery prep and briefing cycles through evidence-first synthesis.
Status: Requires rollout conditions
Proof anchors: matter_scope, evidence_retrieval, contradiction_checks.
- Matter membership hard-scoped from the start — No cross-matter leakage in evidence and exports
- Query output includes supporting evidence chunks — Search gaps surfaced with corpus/coverage posture
- Potentially conflicting evidence states surfaced in workflow — Discovery defects highlighted before draft finalization
Auditability
Keep legal decisions anchored by review artifacts and signed states.
Status: Pilot-only components included
Proof anchors: review_gate, trcp_privilege, op_705.
- Stateful work-product handoff — Reasoned escalation and rejection trails
- Privilege context built faster than manual-only workflows — Durable mark-reviewed task markers in flow
- Supervision posture exposed at workflow boundaries — Export path includes attestation provenance when enabled
Shipped capabilities are production-safe for the current workflow. Partial capabilities are available with clearly stated rollout or external verification caveats.
Need workflow-by-workflow evaluation? Request a rollout-specific review.
Claim transparency
What is shipped, what is partial, and what is pilot
All public claims map to this single source. Partial and pilot capabilities stay explicit with caveat language for rollout conditions.
Shipped5
Requires rollout conditions5
Pilot-only2
| Capability | Status | Proof route | Claim note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Matter-scoped intake and isolation | Shipped in production | workflow | No caveat required |
| Evidence-backed retrieval and analysis lane | Shipped in production | query | No caveat required |
| Contradiction and discovery-defect checks | Requires rollout conditions | query | The current workflow uses a candidate-generation heuristic and is not yet calibrated for production reliance; benchmark and attorney review gates are required. |
| Evidence pack with source-linked excerpts | Shipped in production | evidence_pack | No caveat required |
| Citation trust postures and state transitions | Requires rollout conditions | citation_posture | All citation states are visible; some external verifiers can remain unavailable or degraded. |
| Reviewer gate: approve, escalate, reject | Shipped in production | review_gate | No caveat required |
| Legal deadline and litigation timeline checks | Requires rollout conditions | workflow | Only covered TRCP subsets and mapped local rules are automated in production; some edge scenarios route to manual handling. |
| TRCP 193.3 privilege log generator | Requires rollout conditions | workflow | Matter-context assembly and mark-reviewed persistence are available, but pilot-grade export proof is still constrained by rollout conditions. |
| Texas Greenbook audit mode | Shipped in production | citation_posture | No caveat required |
| Texas Business Court advisory | Pilot-only | venue | Advisory output only; attorney judgment remains the decision boundary. |
| Op. 705 attestation workflow | Pilot-only | review_gate | Service exists, but firm-specific rollout conditions and per-matter export controls still gate full production confidence. |
| Docket and communication connectors | Requires rollout conditions | integrations | Connector health and sync completeness vary by tenant credentials and source permissions. |
7 capability(ies) are partial/pilot. They are used for evaluation and pilot planning only, with explicit caveats in every relevant copy context.
If you need an external-facing assurance matrix, request the demo and we will walk through each route, state transition, and evidence artifact in the seeded Texas matter.
Proof visuals
A sequence you can judge quickly
The strongest demo narrative is not a screenshot carousel — it is a sequenced proof lane that makes uncertainty actionable.
Intake / proof posture
Matter scope lock, posture, and task stack in the command center.
Shipped in production
Evidence pack + contradictions
Source-linked proposition bundles with support density and discrepancy markers.
Shipped in production
Citation trust board
Verified, thin, unverified, and unsupported citation states side-by-side.
Requires rollout conditions — All citation states are visible; some external verifiers can remain unavailable or degraded.
Reviewer gate outcomes
Draft, pending, approved, escalate, reject, redacted, all surfaced in one lane.
Shipped in production
Texas artifact outputs
Greenbook shipped; TRCP, Op. 705, and advisory paths show rollout posture.
Shipped in production
Flagship proof visualization sequence
Two-column proof frame
Left: query + claim output. Right: uncertainty state timeline and reviewer gate transitions.
What to inspect next
- 1Does uncertainty drop only after new evidence or verifier refresh?
- 2Are unsupported citations blocked from becoming approved artifacts?
- 3Can the reviewer explicitly route to escalation or reject before export?
- 4Can Texas artifact outputs show status boundaries in one pass?
Next action: run to the current matter lane to validate how each state transitions in practice, then compare to export readiness.
Claim-level proof card
Claim output includes support-density and uncertainty posture before approval.
Citation trust board
Unsupported/unsupported states are visible at the same time as verified rows.
Reviewer checkpoint
Drafting cannot be marked final without reviewer action.
Texas output lane
Greenbook is shipped; TRCP and Op. 705 states are rollout-aware.
Inside the workbench
One matter spine. Mapped by proof lane and status.
Surfaces below keep the same proof contract: evidence, uncertainty, and reviewer control all visible in one sequence.
Matter command center
Support posture, citation snapshot, and review pressure before running a query.
Shipped in production
Evidence & query
Matter-scoped query with linked evidence pack and contradiction checks.
Shipped in production
Citation trust board
All trust postures in one panel, including verified and degraded states.
Requires rollout conditions | All citation states are visible; some external verifiers can remain unavailable or degraded.
Review workbench
Approve, reject, escalate, redact, and continue with evidence attached.
Shipped in production
Timeline and deadlines
Procedure-aware timeline and covered/unsupported signal split.
Requires rollout conditions | Only covered TRCP subsets and mapped local rules are automated in production; some edge scenarios route to manual handling.
Integrations
Docket and communications connectors + sync posture.
Requires rollout conditions | Connector health and sync completeness vary by tenant credentials and source permissions.
Texas workflow outputs
Greenbook, TRCP privilege workflows, Op. 705, venue advisory.
Shipped in production
- SHIPPED · Matter-scoped intake and isolation
- SHIPPED · Evidence-backed retrieval and analysis lane
- SHIPPED · Evidence pack with source-linked excerpts
- PARTIAL · Citation trust postures and state transitions
- SHIPPED · Reviewer gate: approve, escalate, reject
- PARTIAL · TRCP 193.3 privilege log generator
- SHIPPED · Texas Greenbook audit mode
- PILOT · Op. 705 attestation workflow
- PILOT · Texas Business Court advisory
Buyer signals
What serious litigation teams validate early.
If the guided demo matches your workflow, these are the signals buyers use to decide whether LexAlign is ready for real matter work.
Review confidence
- •Outputs stay attached to evidence and citations, not just prose.
- •Thin support and degraded checks are visible (not buried).
- •There is a clear reviewer action path (approve / reject / escalate).
Matter-first workflow
- •AI runs against the matter record with scoped retrieval.
- •Teams can track what is covered vs. missing in the corpus.
- •Work product stays organized by matter, not scattered chats.
Evaluation readiness
- •A seeded proof path shows the full workflow in minutes.
- •Trust posture is explicit enough for partner or legal ops scrutiny.
- •The system makes it hard to confuse “retrieved” with “verified.”
Questions serious buyers ask early
Clear answers about fit, trust, scope, and evaluation flow.